Watan First Holding
العربيةContact Us
Abstract editorial illustration: Building a Workforce Ready for the Future
Watan First Academy3 min read

Building a Workforce Ready for the Future

Workforce development creates greater value when learning decisions follow the capabilities a business needs to deliver its strategy.

A business can fund substantial training and still lack the capabilities required for its next stage of growth. Course attendance records show participation. They reveal much less about whether employees can manage a larger operation, adopt a new system or lead a team through change.

Preparing a workforce for the future requires a more specific view of development. Leaders need to identify where strategy will change the work, determine the capabilities required and create opportunities for employees to apply what they learn. Training budgets become more useful when these decisions precede the course catalog.

Translate strategy into work requirements

The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025 found that 63 percent of surveyed employers identified skills gaps as a major barrier to business transformation during 2025–2030.[1] This is a global survey finding, rather than a measure of any individual Saudi organization. It nevertheless highlights an important management question: can the workforce deliver the business plan?

An organization expanding into a new market may need better commercial analysis and stronger local management. A company introducing enterprise software may need employees who can interpret data and manage redesigned workflows. Each ambition implies a different learning priority. Broad labels such as digital skills should be broken down into tasks that employees will actually perform.

Employers anticipate a substantial development need
  • Plan to prioritize upskilling
    85%
  • Identify skills gaps as a barrier
    63%
  • Plan movement into growing roles
    50%

Source: WEF Future of Jobs Report 2025 | Share of surveyed employers | Expectations for 2025–2030

Find the gaps that affect performance

Start with a small number of strategically important roles. Examine work samples, operational results and manager observations alongside employee assessments. Distinguish a capability gap from a process problem. Training an employee to make decisions faster will have limited impact if every decision still requires several unnecessary approvals.

Assessment should support development rather than become an exercise in ranking people. Employees need to understand which expectations have changed, what support is available and how progress will be recognized. A useful baseline makes the next learning decision clearer.

Design learning around application

Different capabilities require different learning experiences. Technical knowledge may benefit from structured digital modules and practice exercises. Leadership judgment often needs discussion, feedback and exposure to difficult decisions. A single format is unlikely to serve both equally well.

Programs should include an opportunity to use the capability in real work. After learning presentation skills, an employee might deliver a project proposal and receive feedback against agreed criteria. Following operational training, a team might redesign one recurring workflow. Managers need to make room for this application instead of treating learning as an activity outside the job.

Learning and development solutions provide a way to organize these experiences around specific work requirements, with opportunities to apply and review the capability.

Connect learning with observable work
  1. Business priority
  2. Capability gap
  3. Targeted learning
  4. Workplace application

Conceptual framework for the relationships between steps

Give managers responsibility for development

HR can coordinate programs, but line managers see whether behavior changes. They should help define the learning objective and review progress after employees return to work. Their role includes coaching and ensuring that new responsibilities are genuinely available.

Digital learning can extend access across locations and schedules. Its effectiveness still depends on relevance and follow-through. A completed module is a useful activity measure; demonstrated capability is a stronger indicator of progress.

Connect investment with business outcomes

Measure outcomes that relate to the original need. These might include reduced rework, improved service resolution or readiness to take on a more complex role. Establish a baseline and consider other changes that may influence the result. It is rarely credible to attribute an entire performance improvement to training alone.

Learning investment becomes easier to justify when managers can show how a capability has changed the work. Review which development activities address the original need and which require a different design.

The next program should follow those findings. A workforce becomes better prepared through repeated decisions about what people need to learn and where they can apply it.

Back to all articles

Ready to Create Greater Value?

Connect with our team to identify the right company and expertise for your organization.

Request a Consultation